Electronic Muscle Stimulation Vest EMS Smart Workout

Electronic Muscle Stimulation Vest

Q&A：

Q: If after the warranty period expires, there is a problem with the product, what should I do?

A: We support you send it to us, we help repair, you only need to pay shipping and maintenance costs, we will provide you with the best repair price.

Q:Can it be used in group teaching?

A: Yes, one system can control 20 people at the same time.

Q: Are you a factory or Trading company ?

A: We are a company which is the joint of trade and industry.

Q: Do you support sample for review quality?

A: Yes .we support sent sample ,sample need charge the sample cost and shipping cost.

Q: Are there any reasons why you should not use the Electronic Muscle Stimulation Vest?

A: The machine must not be used by people with heart disease, pacemakers or other implanted electric devices, during pregnancy, with a predisposition to epileptic seizures or fitting.

Q: Can I eat immediately before workout?

A: In order to achieve an optimum workout effect you should consume high-carb food 2.5 to 3 hours before the session. You should not eat two hours before workout to avoid abdominal discomfort.

More Research on EMS in Sports

Having used Electronic Muscle Stimulation (EMS) for the last 20 years as both an athlete and coach, I've often wondered why it hasn't been adopted as a regular training method. Based on my experience, EMS smart workout technology effectively improves strength and enhances recovery. The February 2012 issue of the NSCA's Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research further supports this with an article by Girould et al. titled "Dry-Land Strength Training vs. Electrical Stimulation in Sprint Swimming Performance."

The study, conducted at the University of Poitiers in France, compared EMS with conventional dry-land strength training for national-level sprint swimmers. Twenty-four swimmers (12 men, 12 women), averaging 22 years old, were divided into three groups: one followed a conventional dry-land program, another used only EMS smart workout technology, and the third did no strength training. All groups maintained their regular 10 weekly swimming sessions over four weeks. Athletes were tested before (W0), immediately after (W4), and four weeks post-training (W8). Researchers analyzed peak torque during arm extension, stroke rate, and stroke length in a 50m front crawl across all testing periods.

Results

After the training period, a significant increase in mean swimming velocity was observed in both the Strength Training (S) group and the Electro-Stimulation (ES) group, with both groups maintaining velocity improvements four weeks post-training. There were no significant differences between the S and ES groups at any point, while the Control (C) group showed no improvement throughout the study.

Interestingly, after the four-week EMS smart workout training period, stroke length significantly improved for the S group but not for the ES or C groups. Stroke rate improved for both the S and ES groups, but not for the C group. These findings highlight the effectiveness of EMS smart workout technology in enhancing athletic performance, particularly in stroke rate, while demonstrating comparable results to traditional strength training methods.

An examination of peak torque in concentric conditions at 60 and 180 degrees per second after the four-week training period revealed that the S and ES groups exhibited significant improvements, while the C group did not. When examining eccentric and isometric conditions at 60 degrees per second, only the ES group showed significant improvements. All of these results were consistent over the additional four weeks following the end of the training period.

Aim of the study: Regular physical activity has found to be a strategy to increase exercise capacity in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). Next to endurance training also electromyostimulation (EMS) of thigh and gluteal muscles results in an increased capacity in CHF patients. EMS therapy was either done by stimulating 8 major muscle groups involving also trunk and arm muscles (extended electromyostimulation (exEMS)) in comparison to EMS therapy limited to gluteal and leg muscles (limEMS).

Methods: 31 individuals completed the EMS training program. Stable CHF patients (NYHA class II-III) received either exEMS (18 patients, 11 males, mean age 59.8±13.8 years) or limEMS (13 patients, 10 males, 63.6±9.4 years). Training was performed for 10 weeks twice weekly for 20 min, the level of daily activity remained unchanged. Effects on exercise capacity, left ventricular function (EF - ejection fraction) and QoL (quality of life) were evaluated.

Results: QoL was found to be improved in all domains of the SF-36 questionnaire. In the exEMS group there was a significant improvement in the domain physical functioning (54.09±29.9 to 75.45±15.6, p=0.48) and emotional role (63.63±45.8 to 93.93±20.1 p=0.048). LimEMS group showed significant improvement in the domain vitality (37.5±6.9 to 52.8±12.5, p=0.02).There was a significant increase of oxygen uptake at aerobic threshold in all groups (exEMS: +29.6%, p<0.001; limEMS +17.5%, p<0.001). EF -increased from 36.94±8.6 to 42.36±9.1% (+14.7%, p=0.003) in the exEMS group (limEMS 37.7±3.6 to 40.3±5.9% [+6.9%, p=0.18]).

Conclusion: EMS contributes to an improved quality of life and can improve oxygen uptake and EF in CHF. It may be an alternative therapy in CHF patients who are otherwise unable to undertake conventional forms of exercise training.